Overseas funds are pulling out of six major Asian emerging equity markets at a pace unseen since the global financial crisis of 2008 — withdrawing $19 billion from India, Indonesia, the Philippines, South Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand so far this year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
Why are they pulling money out?
Investing in emerging economies is considered riskier than investing in U.S. stocks.
Since interest rates in the U.S have been near zero since the financial crisis, investors have looked to other countries for better investment returns.
The Fed (federal reserve) has started raising interest rates. In doing so, its attracted money back to the U.S and away from emerging economies.
In addition, investors are worried that trade disputes and tariffs could have a negative effect on Asian economies.
Should you be a buyer?
It depends on your investment objectives. Here are two questions to ask:
• Are emerging markets currently a part of your allocation?
• Emerging markets carry a higher degree of risk. Can you accept the greater potential return for greater volatility?
This is a new and developing market. If you are going to put money at risk it needs to be money you can afford to lose.
In addition, you need to have a 10 year+ time frame. If the upside in this industry is as large as people think it is, it will take time to develop and grow.
One thing to keep in mind.
In the U.S., while cannabis is legal in a handful of states, it’s still illegal at the federal level. Some banks and brokerages won’t take the legal and reputational risk of holding stocks that are illegal at the federal level.
Most of the investment products available for retail investors are based out of Canada and trade on their TSX exchange. Recreational marijuana will be legal in Canada sometime this fall, possibly August or September.
I am still new to this space and don’t have any insights yet. I will report what I am reading and a few investment options for you to look at.
The largest ETF in this space is ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (ticker MJ) with $300 million + in AUM. You can buy this ETF at most U.S. brokerages.
The management fee is 0.75% or 75 basis points. For every $100 invested, you pay 75 cents.
Yum Brands Buys a $200 Million Dollar Stake in GrubHub. (Bloomberg)
From the article:
And that highlights how much GrubHub and others of its ilk — Uber Eats, DoorDash, Caviar — are becoming powerful gatekeepers in the dining industry. Restaurants should not underestimate what a paradigm shift this is for them. In these digital marketplaces, the primary customer allegiance will be to the app, not to the individual restaurant.
That means restaurants will have to think hard about how to market and merchandise their offerings in what will essentially be a fiercely competitive digital food hall.
Also from the article:
Why does this consolidation matter for restaurant chains? In some ways, it makes their lives easier, because they can focus on making their relationship with one platform really great instead of trying to do business with a slew of them.
In other ways, though, it could make their situation harder. Less competition among delivery providers could make it easier for those players to demand bigger commissions from restaurants.
GrubHub has a large lead and I think this will become a winner take all market(see McKinsey study below).
I don’t have insights into either business, however, the Bloomberg article noted that both companies were pitching investors that how they would earn money in the future is different than how they are earning money now.
From the article:
All of the Dropbox customers featured in the video are businesses — tiny, medium and large — not the individuals who make up the vast majority of Dropbox’s paying customers. Businesses also were the featured customers in Dropbox’s financial prospectus to potential investors.
This makes sense. What they provide to individuals, storage, is largely undifferentiated from say Gdrive. I use both. Frankly, I like Gdrive better. It’s not to say individuals can’t make a good business, but in order to grow in the future, they have to find another source of revenue.
Reinsurance insures the insurers. They are not consumer-facing companies.
For example: Blue Cross is a consumer-facing health insurance company. Say they have a risk pool(policies) of $10 million dollars. They might pay for the first $2 million dollars of claims out of their own pocket and lay the other $8 million of claims off to a reinsurance company.
In order to do this, they pay said reinsurance company a premium. How much will depend on the amount of risk they are keeping and the amount they are passing off to the reinsurance company.
Our goal is to watch what other investors are doing and find a way to take a position against them if the risk/reward is favorable. We are looking for mispriced bets.
Betting on volatility
This article from the WSJ discusses who is making the bet.
From the article:
Donald Pierce, the chief investment officer of the $9.3 billion San Bernardino County Employees’ Retirement Association, has been trading volatility for about six years, most recently by buying options on stock indexes, often with trades equivalent to about $300 million of risk for the plan.
Sometimes, Mr. Pierce buys products betting on rising volatility. Other times he sells these products, depending on his view of where U.S., Japanese, Russian, Brazilian and other markets are headed. Mr. Pierce says his trading has saved the county millions recently and that he will continue to make volatility trades.
He is making bets based on “his view” of the world. We don’t do that. There are too many variables that affect asset prices. We watch other investors, like Mr. Pierce, who like to make bets based on what they think will happen.