Important: We categorize investments in two ways. Strategic or tactical; occasionally, they can be both. Most of the trades we cover fall into the tactical bucket.
Strategic: Occasionally, we have insight into a specific company or theme and we are willing to make a 5-10 year bet to see if it plays out. In this category, we are looking for a business that has the potential to be a monopoly (legal of course), dominate their category, and build a durable moat.
Tactical: For these trades, we have a specific price target to take profits at and a stop to protect our downside. For more information on how we evaluate these trades, read this article.
1. New feature
Our new section is called “The Chartbook.” This is where we will house our charts of stocks and ETFs. It’s a little bare now, but eventually, it will include all Russell 1000 stocks and all major ETFs.
It’s a great place to go hunting for trade ideas. All that’s up now is the major indexes, which are free, but by the end of the next week, I hope to have all major S&P 500 sectors entered.
We have become an “asset-light” economy. Quote from Warren Buffett’s annual shareholder meeting.
FAANG stocks were crushed in October. Rally over?
These categories of smart home technology are poised for growth.
Public offerings: How Moderna Therapeutics wants to revolutionize drug manufacturing.
Two signs a recession “might” be near.
Canada is fragile.
1. Spotify vs the record labels.
The above chart is Spotify’s gross margin since 2013.
As a refresher, gross margin is (Revenue – Cost of Revenue).
From an article by Music Business Worldwide:
During the last round of negotiations with the three major record labels (Universal, Sony, and Warner), Spotify was able to reduce their payout to the record labels from 55% towards 52%. Hence the bump in gross margin improvement
The reduction was granted on the basis that Spotify hit steep subscriber targets.
See the problem… The percentage Spotify pays out to the labels has a direct effect on their gross margin.
“Is this a healthy correction in a bull market with further to run, a reset lower in belated recognition of this year’s geopolitical risk, or the start of a new bear market?”
Our view: Trying to figure out how deep a correction will be or how long it will last is a waste of time because it is out of our control. All we can control is our behavior. Let’s focus our attention on deploying money into investments that we believe offer more upside than downside.
Paypal is growing at 21% and we still don’t know much about Braintree and Venmo. Braintree and Venmo are two assets Paypal owns. PayPal doesn’t give us much information on the performance of those two businesses. Paypal’s future growth will depend on how well they grow and build defensible businesses with Braintree and Venmo.
Paypal’s three main businesses
• B2B = Business to business
• B2C = Business to consumer
A quick look at their earnings
Excluding the sale of a loan portfolio, revenue grew 21%; in line with expectations. EPS rose 17%, beating analyst estimates and the company raised full-year guidance.
Paypal’s traditional product is the button you see when buying something online. (see above)
Estimates say this button accounted for 86% of last year’s revenue. However, analysts have good visibility as to the growth of this product, thus there is not much room for upside surprises.
The bigger growth driver for Paypal will be Braintree and Venmo.
Braintree is B2B (business to business) product that specializes in mobile and web payment systems for e-commerce companies such as Uber and Airbnb.
Braintree processed 1.64 billion transactions in the third quarter, up 33% from a year ago.
Venmo is a B2C (business to consumer) product that allows you to pay and request money from your friends. Verto analytics estimates that Venmo has 10 million unique monthly users as of August.
According to the WSJ, 24% of Venmo users have used the app in a way that generates money for the company. This is up 17% from a year earlier.
Both of these products, Braintree and Venmo, have a macro tailwind as both digital payments and the use of mobile apps to manage money grows in the coming years; especially with millennials.
“Roku began life inside Netflix as project Griffin. Netflix wanted to build a player that subscribers could hook up to their TV to stream movies and TV shows from the web.
Netflix believed it could fundamentally change how the company delivered content to its customers, who were used to waiting days for DVDs to arrive by mail.
In December 2007, the device was weeks away from launching and Netflix CEO Reed Hastings was having serious second thoughts.”
The problem? Hastings realized that if Netflix shipped its own hardware, it would complicate potential partnerships with other hardware makers. “Reed said to me one day, ‘I want to be able to call Steve Jobs and talk to him about putting Netflix on Apple TV,’” recalls one high-level source. “‘But if I’m making my own hardware, Steve’s not going to take my call.’”
In the end, Hastings decided to spin the company out into a sperate entity called “Roku”.
Overseas funds are pulling out of six major Asian emerging equity markets at a pace unseen since the global financial crisis of 2008 — withdrawing $19 billion from India, Indonesia, the Philippines, South Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand so far this year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
Why are they pulling money out?
Investing in emerging economies is considered riskier than investing in U.S. stocks.
Since interest rates in the U.S have been near zero since the financial crisis, investors have looked to other countries for better investment returns.
The Fed (federal reserve) has started raising interest rates. In doing so, its attracted money back to the U.S and away from emerging economies.
In addition, investors are worried that trade disputes and tariffs could have a negative effect on Asian economies.
Should you be a buyer?
It depends on your investment objectives. Here are two questions to ask:
• Are emerging markets currently a part of your allocation?
• Emerging markets carry a higher degree of risk. Can you accept the greater potential return for greater volatility?